"Has your school spent tens of thousands or more dollars on fluency-based reading assessment programs? If so, you might be getting less for your investment than you think. Did you know: there is little consensus on what exactly fluency is; the NRP's report - the basis for Reading First - failed to support its assertion that "it is generally acknowledged that fluency is a critical component of skilled reading"; and the relationship between fluency and comprehension may be vastly overstated by the conventional wisdom?" "Challenging commonly held notions of the effectiveness and importance of fluency, Rereading Fluency provides information any teacher or administrator needs to determine the most effective way to help students read well." "Combining a review of prior research with findings from their own analysis of more than 120 second grade readers, Bess Altwerger, Nancy Jordan, and Nancy Rankie Shelton detail why, as a measure of reading success, fluency can fall flat. Using a multischool, multiprogram study, they compare the effects of commercial, phonics-based programs and noncommercial literature-based programs on students' fluency and overall proficiency. The results will surprise you: faster, more accurate readers aren't always better comprehenders; decoding rates are highly variable among readers with similar comprehension levels; commercial, phonics-based programs do not result in better decoding, faster and more accurate reading, or better comprehension; and performance on fluency assessments says little if anything about students' ability to read and understand literature." "Altwerger, Jordan, and Shelton don't just dismantle the arguments for considering fluency a key component of reading, they come through with specific critiques of DIBELS and offer better ways to assess reading (effective and efficient, not just fluent) that can improve instruction, assessment, and the success of young readers."--BOOK JACKET.